A risk assessment template provides structure for identifying hazards and recording control measures in your workplace. However, templates are starting points, not finished products—you must adapt them to reflect your actual workplace hazards and controls.
What do you need from a risk assessment template?
Let's guide you to the right approach.
Why use a risk assessment template?
Templates provide helpful structure for recording your risk assessment findings systematically. They ensure you don't miss essential information and provide a consistent format across your organization.
Benefits of using templates
Structure and consistency:
- Prompts you to consider all necessary elements
- Ensures consistent format across different assessments
- Makes it easier for others to read and understand
- Helps with training new assessors
Time efficiency:
- Faster than creating documents from scratch
- Reduces time spent on formatting
- Allows focus on identifying hazards rather than document design
Compliance confidence:
- Good templates reflect legal requirements
- Include all mandatory information
- Help demonstrate systematic approach
Communication tool:
- Standardized format aids understanding
- Easy to share with employees and inspectors
- Simplifies review and update processes
A template is a starting point, not a shortcut. It provides structure for documenting your workplace-specific hazards and controls. Never simply download a template, add your company name, and file it as your risk assessment—that's not adequate and provides no protection.
The critical warning about templates
Before you download any template, understand this crucial point:
A generic risk assessment downloaded from the internet and filed with your company name on it is worse than having no assessment at all. Here's why:
- It doesn't identify your actual workplace hazards
- It won't reflect the controls you actually have in place
- It provides no protection to your workers
- It offers no legal defense if challenged
- HSE inspectors can easily spot generic assessments
- It's evidence you know you should assess risks but haven't done so properly
Courts and inspectors would rather see a simple, handwritten assessment that genuinely reflects your workplace than a professional-looking template that bears no relation to reality.
Common template pitfalls
Mistake 1: Copy and paste without thinking Leaving generic hazards and controls that don't apply to your workplace.
Mistake 2: Keeping irrelevant sections A construction template used for an office, still listing hazards like excavations and scaffolding.
Mistake 3: Vague, template language "Adequate controls in place" without specifying what they actually are.
Mistake 4: Ignoring your specific hazards Your workplace has unique hazards not covered in the generic template, and you don't add them.
Mistake 5: Never updating the template content Using the same downloaded content year after year without reviewing whether it reflects current reality.
Manufacturing company fined £80,000 for using generic template without customization
A worker suffered serious hand injury from unguarded machinery. The company had a professional-looking risk assessment on file, but investigation revealed it was a generic template downloaded from an industry website with only the company name changed.
- ✗Risk assessment was generic template for the sector, not specific to the workplace
- ✗Didn't identify the specific machines and their actual guarding
- ✗Control measures listed didn't match what was present in the factory
- ✗Template included hazards not present in their workplace
- ✗Company admitted no one had walked the floor or consulted workers
- ✗Assessment had been 'reviewed' annually by changing the date, but content never updated
HSE prosecution resulted in £80,000 fine plus £25,000 costs. Judge stated: 'The risk assessment was worthless. It was not suitable and sufficient because it bore no relation to the actual workplace. The company had the appearance of compliance without the substance.' Civil claim also pursued.
Templates must be thoroughly customized to your workplace. Walk through your premises, identify your actual hazards, and document your real controls. A simple, honest assessment beats a sophisticated generic one every time.
Essential template sections
A suitable and sufficient risk assessment template should include these core sections:
1. Assessment details
Basic information:
- Activity or area being assessed — Be specific (e.g., "Warehouse manual handling operations" not just "Warehouse")
- Date of assessment — When it was conducted
- Assessed by — Name and role of the person who conducted it
- Approved by — Person with authority to ensure actions are implemented
- Review date — When it will be next reviewed
- Version or reference number — For tracking updates
Purpose of this section: Identifies what's being assessed and provides audit trail for accountability and review scheduling.
2. Hazard identification
Information to capture:
- List of all significant hazards identified
- Location or context of each hazard
- Brief description of how the hazard could cause harm
Tips for this section:
- Be specific: "Wet floor in customer area after cleaning" not just "Slips"
- Group related hazards sensibly
- Focus on significant risks, not trivial hazards
- Consider all hazard types: physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic, psychosocial
Example format:
| Hazard | Location/Context | Potential Harm |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy boxes requiring manual handling | Warehouse receiving area | Back strain, muscle injury |
| Trailing electrical cables | Office walkways | Trip, fall, potential electrical hazard if damaged |
| Aggressive customer behavior | Reception desk | Physical assault, verbal abuse, psychological trauma |
3. Who might be harmed
Information to capture:
- All groups of people at risk
- How they might be harmed
- Any groups especially at risk (legal requirement)
Groups to consider:
- Employees (by role, shift, or characteristic)
- Contractors and maintenance workers
- Visitors and customers
- Members of the public
- Vulnerable groups: young workers, pregnant workers, disabled workers, lone workers, inexperienced workers
Example format:
| Hazard | Who Might Be Harmed | How They Might Be Harmed | Especially Vulnerable Groups |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heavy boxes manual handling | Warehouse staff, delivery drivers | Back injury, muscle strain, herniated discs | New starters unfamiliar with techniques, older workers with existing back problems |
4. Existing control measures
Information to capture:
- What controls are already in place
- Whether they're working effectively
- Whether they comply with legal requirements
Types of controls to document:
- Elimination — Hazard removed entirely
- Substitution — Replaced with safer alternative
- Engineering controls — Guards, barriers, ventilation, isolation
- Administrative controls — Procedures, training, supervision, permits
- PPE — Personal protective equipment provided
Example format:
| Hazard | Existing Controls | Are They Adequate? |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy boxes manual handling | • Manual handling training provided to all warehouse staff • Trolleys available for moving multiple boxes • Maximum weight guidance of 25kg displayed | Partially — Training is good, but trolleys not always used. Some boxes exceed 25kg guidance. |
Don't just list ideal controls you wish you had. Document the controls that actually exist in your workplace right now. Then use the "further actions" section to record what improvements are needed.
5. Risk evaluation
Information to capture:
- Assessment of whether existing controls are adequate
- Level of remaining risk (can be qualitative: low/medium/high)
- Whether the risk is acceptable or requires further action
Approach: You don't need complex risk matrices or numerical scoring for most risks. Simple qualitative assessment is fine:
- Low risk — Unlikely to cause harm, or would cause only minor harm if it did. Controls adequate.
- Medium risk — Could cause significant harm, or more likely to cause harm. Review controls and consider improvements.
- High risk — Likely to cause serious harm, or could cause severe harm if controls fail. Immediate action required.
Example:
| Hazard | Current Risk Level | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy manual handling | Medium | Some injuries have occurred in past year. Controls partially effective but not consistently applied. |
The HSE doesn't require numerical risk ratings. Focus on whether controls are adequate, not on calculating risk scores. Ask: "Are the precautions reasonable, or do we need to do more?" That's the key question.
6. Further action required
This is the most important section — it's where you record what needs to improve.
Information to capture:
- Specific action required
- Who is responsible for implementing it
- Target completion date
- Priority (high/medium/low)
- Completion status
Be specific:
- Vague: "Improve manual handling controls"
- Specific: "Purchase 3 additional trolleys for warehouse use and retrain all staff on their use"
Assign responsibility:
- Vague: "Management to action"
- Specific: "Warehouse Manager (John Smith)"
Set realistic deadlines:
- Consider the risk level: high risks need urgent action
- Ensure the person responsible has time and resources
- Follow up if deadlines are missed
Example format:
| Action Required | Responsible Person | Target Date | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase 3 additional trolleys for warehouse | Warehouse Manager (J. Smith) | 28 Feb 2025 | High | Pending |
| Implement max weight policy: boxes over 20kg to be team-lifted or use mechanical aid | Operations Director (A. Jones) | 31 Jan 2025 | High | Pending |
| Refresher manual handling training for all warehouse staff | H&S Advisor (M. Brown) | 15 Feb 2025 | Medium | Pending |
7. Review information
Information to capture:
- Date of next scheduled review
- Triggers for earlier review
- Record of any interim reviews conducted
Review triggers to list:
- Annual review (minimum)
- Following any incident or near miss
- When work activities, processes, or equipment change
- When new employees start, particularly vulnerable workers
- When new information about hazards becomes available
Example:
Next review date: December 2025
Review earlier if:
- Any manual handling injury occurs
- New equipment or handling aids introduced
- Changes to products or packaging requiring different handling
- Significant changes to warehouse layout
Template formats and structures
Different formats suit different workplaces and preferences.
Format 1: Simple table format
Best for: Small workplaces with straightforward risks
Advantages:
- Clear and concise
- Easy to update
- Fits on one or two pages
- Can be handwritten or typed
Structure:
| Hazard | Who's at risk | Existing controls | Risk level | Further actions | By whom | By when | Done |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Hazard] | [Groups] | [Controls in place] | Low/Med/High | [Specific action] | [Name] | [Date] | [ ] |
Format 2: Detailed narrative format
Best for: Complex hazards requiring detailed explanation
Advantages:
- Allows more explanation and context
- Suitable for complex processes
- Can include diagrams or photos
- Helpful for training purposes
Structure: Each hazard gets its own section with full descriptions under standard headings:
- Hazard description
- Who might be harmed and how
- Existing control measures
- Risk evaluation and justification
- Further actions required
Format 3: Activity-based format
Best for: Assessing step-by-step processes or tasks
Advantages:
- Follows natural workflow
- Identifies risks at each stage of activity
- Good for method statements
- Helps identify sequence-specific hazards
Structure: Break the activity into steps, then assess hazards at each step.
Example: Unloading delivery vehicle
| Step | Hazard | Controls | Further Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Open vehicle doors | Striking head on door, items falling from vehicle | Visual check before opening, stand to side | None — adequate |
| 2. Lower tail lift | Crushing, fall from height if standing on lift | Only authorized users, barriers in place, training | Add warning signs to vehicle parking area |
| 3. Move boxes from vehicle | Manual handling, slips on wet tail lift | Team lifting for heavy items, non-slip surface on lift | Provide additional trolley |
Format 4: Hazard category format
Best for: Comprehensive workplace assessments covering multiple hazard types
Advantages:
- Ensures all hazard categories considered
- Systematic and thorough
- Good for general workplace assessments
Structure: Organize by hazard type:
- Physical hazards (slips, trips, falls, manual handling, machinery)
- Chemical hazards (COSHH substances)
- Biological hazards (infections, Legionella)
- Fire hazards
- Electrical hazards
- Ergonomic hazards (DSE, repetitive tasks)
- Psychosocial hazards (stress, violence, lone working)
Simple vs Detailed Template
Simple Table Template
- •One or two pages
- •Quick to complete
- •Good for straightforward risks
- •Easy for employees to read
- •Sufficient for most small workplaces
- •Less detail on control rationale
Detailed Narrative Template
- •Multiple pages per assessment
- •Time-consuming to complete
- •Necessary for complex hazards
- •Can include diagrams and photos
- •Required for high-risk activities
- •More comprehensive explanation
Bottom line: Choose the format that's proportionate to your risks and useful for your audience. A simple template is fine for low-risk environments. Complex or high-risk activities justify more detailed documentation.
How to use templates effectively
Follow these steps to use templates properly:
Step 1: Choose an appropriate template
Select a template that:
- Covers the type of workplace or activity you're assessing
- Matches the complexity of your risks
- Includes all mandatory sections
- Is from a reputable source (HSE, industry body, professional consultant)
HSE templates available for:
- General workplace assessment
- Offices
- Retail and warehouses
- Manufacturing
- Catering and hospitality
- Construction activities
- Care homes and healthcare
Available at: www.hse.gov.uk/risk/assessment-templates
Step 2: Walk your workplace
Before filling in any template:
- Physically walk through your workplace during normal operations
- Observe actual work practices, not what should happen
- Talk to employees about hazards they experience
- Check accident and near-miss records
- Review manufacturer instructions and safety data sheets
- Note everything that could cause harm
Don't skip this step. You cannot complete a template from your desk and expect it to reflect reality.
Step 3: Customize ruthlessly
As you complete the template:
Delete:
- Irrelevant hazards that don't exist in your workplace
- Template text that doesn't apply to you
- Examples and placeholder text
Add:
- Your specific hazards that aren't in the template
- Your actual control measures
- Your workplace-specific context
Modify:
- Generic descriptions to match your situation exactly
- Control measures to reflect what you actually have
- Terminology to match your workplace language
Step 4: Be specific and accurate
Replace template generalities with workplace specifics:
Template says: "Provide appropriate manual handling training" Your assessment should say: "All warehouse staff receive manual handling training during induction and refresher training every 2 years. Records kept by H&S Advisor."
Template says: "Adequate guarding on machinery" Your assessment should say: "All saws have fixed guards and emergency stop buttons. Interlock prevents operation with guard open. Guards inspected weekly by supervisor (checklist in workshop office)."
Template says: "Risk is low" Your assessment should say: "Risk is low because guards are functioning correctly, all operators are trained, and weekly inspections identify any deterioration promptly."
Step 5: Involve workers
Don't complete the template in isolation:
- Consult employees about hazards they experience
- Ask them what controls are actually used in practice
- Get their input on what additional measures would be practical
- Have them review the completed assessment for accuracy
Workers doing the job every day know hazards you'll miss and whether controls actually work in practice. Consultation improves assessment quality and is a legal requirement under health and safety law.
Step 6: Focus on the action plan
The most important part of any risk assessment is the action plan. Don't rush this section.
For each action:
- Make it specific and measurable
- Assign to a named individual
- Set a realistic but firm deadline
- Assign priority based on risk level
- Track completion
- Verify the action was effective
High-risk actions need immediate attention:
- Deadline measured in days or weeks, not months
- Interim controls while permanent solution is implemented
- Regular follow-up until completed
Step 7: Approve and communicate
Once completed:
- Have it approved by someone with authority to ensure actions are implemented
- Sign and date it
- Share with relevant employees
- Make it accessible for reference
- Communicate any changes or new controls
Step 8: Treat it as a living document
Your risk assessment isn't finished when you complete the template:
- Update it as actions are completed
- Review it regularly (annually minimum)
- Revise it when circumstances change
- Keep superseded versions to show progression
Worked examples
Example 1: Small office risk assessment
Assessment for: General office environment Date: 15 January Assessed by: Jane Smith, Office Manager Review date: December 2025
| Hazard | Who's at risk | Existing controls | Risk level | Further actions | Responsible | Target date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trailing cables across walkways | All staff, visitors | Cables taped down where they cross walkways | Medium | Install additional power outlets to eliminate trailing cables. Interim: use cable covers instead of tape | Facilities Manager | 31 March 2025 | Pending |
| Poor DSE setup at some desks | Office staff using computers regularly | Adjustable chairs provided, monitors available | Medium | Complete DSE self-assessments for all staff. Provide any equipment identified as needed (footrests, risers, ergonomic mice) | H&S Advisor with each staff member | 31 Jan 2025 | Pending |
| Boxes stored on top of filing cabinets | All staff, particularly those retrieving files | Warning signs on cabinets | Medium | Remove all items from cabinet tops. Provide additional storage at floor level | Office Manager | 15 Jan 2025 | Pending |
| Fire exits blocked by equipment | All building users | Fire exits checked weekly | High | Immediately remove all obstructions. Implement daily check by receptionist. Communicate to all staff | Office Manager (immediate), then receptionist (ongoing) | Immediate | Completed 17 Dec |
Groups especially at risk: New starters unfamiliar with office layout (fire risks). Older employees may be at higher risk from trips and DSE-related issues.
- December 2025, or sooner if office layout changes, new equipment introduced, or any incidents occur.
Example 2: Small retail shop risk assessment
Assessment for: Customer-facing retail operations Date: 15 January Assessed by: Ahmed Patel, Shop Owner Review date: December 2025
Hazard 1: Manual handling of stock deliveries
Who might be harmed: Shop staff (2 employees), delivery drivers
How they might be harmed: Back injury, muscle strain, dropped items causing foot/toe injuries
Existing controls:
- Staff trained in manual handling during induction
- Heavier items (over 15kg) unpacked by delivery driver and placed on shelves
- Trolley available for moving multiple items
- Safety footwear (steel toe caps) provided and worn by staff
Is risk adequately controlled? Partially. Trolley is small and not suitable for larger deliveries. Some staff occasionally lift heavy items alone.
Further actions:
- Purchase larger trolley suitable for bigger boxes — By shop owner — By 31 Jan 2025 — High priority
- Implement clear policy: items over 15kg must be team-lifted or use trolley — By shop owner — Immediate — High priority
- Refresher manual handling training at team meeting — By H&S consultant — By end Feb 2025 — Medium priority
Hazard 2: Lone working during opening and closing
Who might be harmed: Shop staff when working alone early morning or late evening
How they might be harmed: Violence, robbery, unable to get help if injured, anxiety
Existing controls:
- Mobile phone carried by staff
- Instruction to call 999 if threatened
- Till contains minimal cash overnight
- Owner informed when opening/closing complete
Is risk adequately controlled? No. No panic alarm, no check-in system if staff don't make contact.
Further actions:
- Install panic alarm button at till linked to owner's mobile — By shop owner — By 28 Feb 2025 — High priority
- Implement buddy system: staff call colleague/owner on arrival and when leaving — By shop owner — Immediate — High priority
- Consider having 2 staff present for opening/closing hours — By shop owner — Review after other measures implemented — Medium priority
- December 2025, or sooner if incident occurs, new staff employed, or shop hours change.
Example 3: Workshop manual task assessment
Activity assessed: Cutting wood panels using table saw Date: 15 January Assessed by: Michael Brown, Workshop Supervisor Review date: December 2025 or when process changes
| Step | Hazard | Who's at risk | Controls in place | Adequate? | Actions needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Select wood panel | Manual handling — back strain | Workshop staff | Trolley used to move panels from rack, panels stored at waist height | Yes | None |
| 2. Measure and mark panel | None significant | — | — | — | — |
| 3. Set up table saw | Hand contact with blade during setup, electrical shock | Workshop staff | Saw unplugged during blade changes, gloves NOT worn (entanglement risk), training provided | Yes | None — current practice correct |
| 4. Switch on and adjust guard | Blade contact, dust inhalation | Workshop staff | Fixed blade guard and riving knife fitted, extraction system connected, operator training completed, push sticks available | Partially | Extraction system is old and not very effective. Action: Service extraction system and check performance (Workshop Supervisor, by 31 Jan 2025, High) |
| 5. Cut panel | Hand contact with blade, kickback, dust exposure, noise | Workshop staff | Push sticks used for final part of cut, riving knife prevents kickback, extraction running, hearing protection available | Partially | Hearing protection "available" not strong enough — make it mandatory. Action: Implement mandatory hearing protection policy for all saw use (Workshop Supervisor, Immediate, High) |
| 6. Remove cut piece and switch off | Blade contact during rundown | Workshop staff | Operator waits for blade to stop before removing pieces, training emphasizes this | Yes | None — good practice observed |
Overall risk level: Medium (was high, now medium with controls, but improvements needed)
Groups especially at risk: New workers and trainees require close supervision. One worker has mild hearing loss — additional protection critical for them.
Small cafe uses simple template to improve kitchen safety
A family-run cafe with 4 staff used a free HSE catering template to assess their kitchen. Owner walked through kitchen operations with staff and customized the template to their specific setup.
- ✓Used HSE catering template as starting point
- ✓Owner and chef walked through each activity together
- ✓Identified hazards specific to their equipment and layout
- ✓Consulted all staff about near-misses and concerns
- ✓Removed irrelevant template sections (they don't do delivery, so removed vehicle hazards)
- ✓Added their specific hazards (narrow doorway between kitchen and dining area)
- ✓Action plan had specific responsibilities and realistic deadlines
Completed risk assessment in 2 hours. Identified 12 significant hazards and implemented 8 improvements within a month (non-slip mats, knife storage, improved ventilation). Staff appreciated being consulted. Simple Word document, only 4 pages. Environmental Health Officer visit 6 months later praised the assessment as 'proportionate, honest, and clearly used as a working document.'
You don't need expensive software or consultants for straightforward risks. A free template, proper observation, staff consultation, and honest documentation is all that's required. The key is customization to your actual workplace.
Common template mistakes to avoid
Mistake 1: Using the wrong template
Problem: Completing a construction template for an office, leaving irrelevant hazards about excavations and scaffolding.
Solution: Choose a template appropriate for your workplace type. If no perfect match exists, start with a general workplace template and customize heavily.
Mistake 2: Leaving placeholder text
Problem: Template says "[Insert company name here]" or "List hazards below" and these instructions remain in the final document.
Solution: Replace all placeholder text with real information. Delete all instructions and examples.
Mistake 3: Vague control measures
Problem: "Adequate controls in place" or "Staff trained appropriately" without specifying what the controls actually are.
Solution: Be specific about what exists: "All staff receive manual handling training during induction (2-hour session) with refresher every 2 years. Training records held by H&S Advisor. Last delivered October 2024."
Mistake 4: No action plan or vague actions
Problem: "Improve safety" or "Management to review" without specific actions, responsibilities, or deadlines.
Solution: Every action must be specific, assigned to a named person, and have a realistic deadline. "Operations Manager (Sarah Jones) to purchase 2 additional trolleys by 31 January 2025."
Mistake 5: Completing it alone at a desk
Problem: Manager fills in template without walking workplace or consulting staff, missing real hazards and documenting controls that don't actually exist.
Solution: Walk the workplace, observe actual practices, check accident records, and consult employees before completing any template.
Mistake 6: Filing and forgetting
Problem: Completed template filed and never looked at again. Actions not implemented, reviews not conducted.
Solution: Treat assessment as living document. Track action completion. Set calendar reminders for review. Update as circumstances change.
Mistake 7: Overcomplicated risk scoring
Problem: Complex risk matrices with numerical scores, color coding, and calculations that obscure whether controls are adequate.
Solution: Keep it simple. Focus on whether risk is adequately controlled, not on calculating scores. Simple low/medium/high is usually sufficient.
Remember: The purpose of risk assessment is preventing harm, not creating perfect documents. A simple, honest assessment that you actually use to improve safety is infinitely better than an elaborate template-based document that sits in a drawer unread.
Frequently asked questions
No. A template downloaded without customization is not a suitable and sufficient risk assessment. You must adapt it to identify your actual hazards, document your real controls, and create a genuine action plan for your workplace. Templates are starting points, not finished products.
No. You can use any format that contains all the necessary information. The HSE templates are excellent free options, but you can create your own, use an industry-specific template, or adapt a consultant's format. What matters is the content, not whose template you used.
As long as necessary to record your significant findings, but no longer. A simple office might need 2-3 pages. A complex manufacturing site might need many pages across multiple assessments. If it's so long that nobody reads it, it's too long. Focus on useful information, not length.
For very small, simple workplaces with limited hazards, yes. But usually it's better to have separate assessments for different areas, activities, or hazard types. Multiple focused assessments are easier to review when specific things change and more useful for communicating relevant risks to specific workers.
It can be helpful. General workplace hazards might use a simple table format. Complex activities might need detailed step-by-step assessment. Specialist risks (COSHH, manual handling, DSE) often use specific templates with appropriate prompts. Choose formats that suit each type of assessment.
Yes, absolutely. Handwritten assessments on printed templates are perfectly acceptable if they're legible and contain all the required information. What matters is accuracy and completeness, not whether it's typed. Some people find it easier to handwrite assessments during workplace walks, then type them up later.
Photos and diagrams can be very helpful, particularly for explaining control measures, showing hazard locations, or documenting 'before and after' improvements. They're not required, but they can make assessments clearer and more useful for training. Just ensure the document doesn't become unwieldy.
No. Update the existing document to reflect changes, then save it with a new date or version number. Keep the old version so you have an evidence trail showing how your assessment has evolved. Don't start from scratch each time—build on what you've already documented.
You can use it as a reference or starting point, but you must customize it thoroughly for your workplace. Every workplace is different—different equipment, layout, working practices, and workforce. What's adequate for them might not be adequate for you. Learn from their approach but create your own assessment.
Add more rows, pages, or sections. Templates are flexible—modify them to suit your needs. If you have many hazards in one area, consider breaking it into multiple focused assessments. Don't try to squeeze information into inadequate space just to fit the template.
Need help adapting templates to complex workplace hazards, or want professionally developed assessments specific to your operations? A qualified health and safety consultant can create tailored risk assessments that go beyond generic templates to reflect your actual risks and controls.
Related articles:
- What is a risk assessment?
- The 5 steps to risk assessment
- What makes a risk assessment suitable and sufficient?
Useful tools: